“Sugar-Coated In Quantum Newtonian Gobshite Of Hawking’s Refusal To Admit The Earth WASN’T The Center Of The Universe”

“they really must get over their continual “wheeling out” of that tired old “sugar coated in quantum” newtonian gobshite of hawkings’, it’s as bad as their earlier refusal to admit that the Earth WASN’T the center of the universe, & the increasingly insane “maths” they kept making up to “prove” that “no, just because it SEEMS to go around the sun don’t mean that mars/venus/jupiter/mercury etc. DON’T go ’round the Earth like what the bible says, ‘ere, look at these new sums wot we just made up”

“The one who follows the crowd will usually get no further than the crowd. The one who walks alone, is likely to find himself in places no one has ever been” Albert Einstein

“physicists” these days should examine more thoroughly Einstein’s basic premise, ie, that “ALL matter nearing/at light-speed,nears/has INFINITE mass, at zero size & (relative to observer) zero time”, ie, consider the plethora of subatomic mass travelling at or near the speed of light, & thus fulfilling Einstein’s criteria for infinite/nearing infinite mass, & the fact that so much of the universe is currently pawned off as “dark matter/energy”, ie, considering that the inverse square law of gravity would also still apply, then if a particle meets the above criteria for infinite mass & yet is “measured” by scientists as having negligible mass & greater than zero size (even though verifiably being a particle mass travelling at lightspeed, then scientists should consider that their “ug have rock, ug brain surgeon” measuring techniques are maybe the point at which the error creeps in (along with their “inside the box” “it can’t weigh THAT much, look how teensy it is, that’s just silly”) , then they are quite probably only measuring OUTSIDE the lightspeed particle’s “event horizon”, which itself is outside it’s “zero point” sized TRUE singularity infinite mass zone, ps, you might also find that you no longer need to use quantum to explain “strange spin” or to “guesstimate” possible positions for other nearby particles, as “slingshot” equations working from a MATHEMATICAL “zero” sized, infinite mass point VIA the inverse square law of gravity wouldst most likely explain such “irregularities” between your current postulates & the comparitive measured observations, well, that & your current “ug have rock, ug brain surgeon” measuring techniques…

“also, don’t neglect to factor in (obviously) the warping of dimensional space/time in the vicinity of such lightspeed particles, they will after all drastically “lens” their immediate vicinity, ie, contracting surrounding space/time about themselves, basically rolling IN “wormholes”…”

 

“&, no doubt, at “infinite mass” itself, “falling through” the “meniscus” of lightspeed & below Einsteinien space/time “tachyon”soup…”

ie, they really must get over their continual “wheeling out” of that tired old “sugar coated in quantum” newtonian gobshite of hawkings’, it’s as bad as their earlier refusal to admit that the Earth WASN’T the center of the universe, & the increasingly insane “maths” they kept making up to “prove” that “no, just because it SEEMS to go around the sun don’t mean that mars/venus/jupiter/mercury etc. DON’T go ’round the Earth like what the bible says, ‘ere, look at these new sums wot we just made up, or we’l crush you under heavy rocks or roll you down a hill strapped like a tyre around a spiky giant heavy wooden wheel”…

“ps, the english being what they are, me wonders “hmm”, me wonders, “did they perchance deliberately cripple hawking especially for their current flogging the dead (& plagiarist anyway) horse’ of newtonian rubbish working to the theory that ‘they won’t question a poor dear cripple now then will they’ “…….”

Ode