“more Brains Alive & Active Globally at same time, makes Species Survival & Growth a more likely prospect”

“….. also, now that recycled plastic bags etc. can provide a cheap precursor for NANO-TUBE Carbon Fiber, the potential is even MORE indisputable, eg, the very fact that nano-tube CF is even stronger than basic CF, but has always been more expensive to “grow” but will now be massively cheaper to produce, allied to the actual structure of those nano-tubes, lends itself to the manufacture of incredibly strong, uni-directional long strings, by simply utilizing the “conical” “telescoping” nature of those nano-tubes”

more Brains Alive & Active Globally at same time, & with access to food, water, technology & resources makes Species Survival & Growth a more likely prospect, by which i mean to say, leaving all the food, water, resources etc. in the greedtard hands of the xenophobic elitist racists that currently claim them, & yet who in general are the stupidest vainest troglodytes in existence & thus the least valid “developers” of such, is COUNTER-Productive to Species Survival, being as their “cul-de-sacian” inbreeding habits lower the gene-pools efficacy on an hourly basis, & have PROVEN to be absolutely detrimental to not only the VAST majority of Humans on the Planet, but to all other Life & the Earth itself. (eg, “that’s a lovely car/house/plasma tele your maj, invent & make it yourself didya?, oh, you just DUG A HOLE & they gave you some plastic to BUY them did they? good for you, you must obviously then be “superior” to People that manage to Survive even though you pissant looters have decimated their Cultures & Environments, how smart you must be, & YES, of COURSE it’s ikea’s fault that you burst into tantrum tears trying to clip together a 3 plank shelf, obviously they haven’t translated the circles & arrows on the picture properly, it’s not that your a bred-for-stupidity corgi at all, is it now diddums”)

ps, & ain’t y’all ever such lucky li’l corgis to be given so many yummo schmackos merely for being obedient li’l obsequious fucktards licking the maggot-white english arses of the thug looters that murdered your ancestors & stole their lands (eg, Ireland), their inventions & their produce before enslaving the remainder & forcing them at club/gun point to keep inventing & making things for them.

i’v always understood that australians are the stupidest corgis on the Planet, i’d merely never before realized exactly HOW stupid a country can be whilst still retaining an autonomous nervous system in a semblance of functionality. go fuck yourselves.

my bad?, what i MEANT to say just now was “go fuck yourselves you gutless lowbrow yellow shivers looking for spines to crawl up, you’v done zero except play in a fucking sandpit since cy oconnor was murdered by the english before he could begin his 2nd proposed pipeline from the kimberleys down to perth in order to stop him from opening oz up via accessible watered land & thus decentralizing the population beyond the ability of the english maggotry to contain y’all in easily cullable cities & towns, ie, before you could become an independent country that could refuse to finance the english, go have another prozac motherfuckers, & don’t forget to wash it down with some fluoride before you breath your daily dose of chlorine in or go swim in your own ocean dumped sewerage”, oh, & go fuck yourselves too.

no need to take into account the weight of the finished product, it was an “in context” remark, as mentioned, in regard to a television “infomercial” bbc show a year or 2 ago featuring “top gear” corgi james may, who was talking about carbon FIBER as “prohibitively expensive at $10 per pound”, which IS the cost of carbon FIBER to produce (although the more you make the cheaper it becomes to make) & as i mentioned in various rants back then, i saw no reason why recycled plastics etc. shouldn’t be used as precursors, which you might note was borne out mere days ago with the release of THIS news report…

Waste Plastic Bags Used To Create Carbon Nanotubes

Discarded plastic bags are if nothing else, certainly one of the most visible forms of litter out there. While it’s possible to recycle some of them into other plastic products, scientists at Australia’s University of Adelaide have found another use for them – they can be used in the production of high-value carbon nanotubes. Researchers in the university’s School of Chemical Engineering had already been growing nanotubes in pores on alumina membranes. Each pore had layers of carbon deposited in it, until enough layers had built up to form a tube. Ethanol was being used as the carbon source.

… besides which, having ridden old style touring & racing bikes & since the 80’s compared them against carbon fiber framed bikes (why i became interested in them) uh, the strength/weight ratio is STILL a massive “real terms” money saver, especially when taking into consideration the huge savings in “shaping” products from carbon fiber compared to shaping SAME products from steel/titanium steel etc, machinery costs alone plummet by using CF, let alone power required for tools etc.to work the materials relative to each-other.

“Gold Would Be A Better Method Than Aluminium As A Core”

“actually gold would be a better method than aluminium as a core, especially if incorporating as fine particulates of in the “weave” of the carbon mesh of the tubes also, mediating the directional current flow potential of the nano-tube into “tributary” offshoots AND allowing for thermo-electric generation ….… worth a mental play with methinx”

also, now that recycled plastic bags etc. can provide a cheap precursor for NANO-TUBE Carbon Fiber, the potential is even MORE indisputable, eg, the very fact that nano-tube CF is even stronger than basic CF, but has always been more expensive to “grow” but will now be massively cheaper to produce, allied to the actual structure of those nano-tubes, lends itself to the manufacture of incredibly strong, uni-directional long strings, by simply utilizing the “conical” “telescoping” nature of those nano-tubes, ie, by simply dropping one inside the other inside the other ad infinitum by making use of the permanent plastic deformation effect, with the “mouth” of the tube upwards & the smaller opening downwards allowing for the hanging of those postulated “space elevators” & that weight itself providing the deformation force required to “draw” a string from the “telescoping” “stack” (as if a set of “Matryona” dolls, but all the same size, drawn out like a pseudo-elemental copper wire, except with each nano-tube representing the actual “atom”… etc, ie, as long as the “string” is only being stressed “downwards” then it will continue supporting those massive weights

Carbon Nanotube – Wikipedia

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are allotropes of carbon with a cylindrical nanostructure. Nanotubes have been constructed with length-to-diameter ratio of up to 132,000,000:1, significantly larger than for any other material. These cylindrical carbon molecules have unusual properties, which are valuable for nanotechnology, electronics, optics and other fields of materials science and technology. In particular, owing to their extraordinary thermal conductivity and mechanical and electrical properties, carbon nanotubes find applications as additives to various structural materials. For instance, nanotubes form a tiny portion of the material(s) in some (primarily carbon fiber) baseball bats, golf clubs, car parts or damascus steel.

of course such “strings”, once “stretched” into length, can then be used in either direction (once “deformed”) then woven, either flat or 3D, as any thread…

@Mu Ustargenai you’r an idiot, go away, why are you (among your other idiocies)( still “thinking” in terms of profits & losses & $z when my entire point is that it NEEDS to be done & it is a BENEFIT to EVERYONE on the Planet, AND to the Planet’s Environment itself, you are so far “inside the box” that the interior walls are out of your view, so you consider them “far horizons”.

oh, AND you’v totally ignored my points as to the FACT that things ALWAYS fet cheaper anyway when mass produced, & that nano-TUBES are soon going to be even cheaper than their weaker cousin CF anyway.

what part of “no plastics required” (apart from recycling plastic shopping bags etc.) to make, NOT mere carbon fiber, but SUPER strong carbon nano tubes do you miss, ie, the plastics are only required in resin form etc. to utilize the carbon fiber thread/matting etc. in the same way as fiberglass, that’s NOT what i’m talking about, i’m saying, a)take one section of nano tube, b) slide 2nd section of nano tube into it, c) utilizing both the near-frictionless nano-tube in nano-tube effect AND the plastic deformity effect (plastic as in plasticity/deformability meaning, not plastic as a type of material) to grab the top of the top nano tube, & the bottom thin end of the interior nano tube, then apply the appropriate tensile force (about 321.1 kilograms) to draw the interior tube out through the base of the exterior tube thus causing the interior tube to “deform” (& become even stronger due to that “plastic deformity” effect) & not lock in place, but instead become unable to fall further through the exterior tube but to be able to turn around in the horizontal (as if a “radiator clamp” was also a “bearing race”) d) draw THAT two-piece joined nano-tube “beginning-of-string” through a 3rd section & repeat, then that 3 piece length through a 4th nano tube, each “plastic deformity” both sealing the sections as an ever-lengthening “string” (more like a “ball chain” of “hourglasses”) where each new section can still rotate horizontally (relative to “thin end” of nano tubes as “down” direction) but that doesn’t weaken from the current “shear effect” problem, & in fact actually becomes LITERALLY much STRONGER, & also, once thus “drawn”, dual-directional & weavable, ie, NO resins required, & thus MASSIVELY lighter than even raw carbon fiber WITHOUT resin added. In fact more like “omni-directional”, ie, it would make damned interesting guitar strings for a start… or crossbow strings.

“no plastics required” (apart from recycling plastic shopping bags etc.) to make, NOT mere carbon fiber, but SUPER strong carbon nano tubes, ie, the plastics are only required in resin form etc. to utilize the carbon fiber thread/matting etc. in the same way as fiberglass, that’s NOT what i’m talking about, i’m saying, a)take one section of nano tube, b) slide 2nd section of nano tube into it, c) utilizing both the near-frictionless nano-tube in nano-tube effect AND the plastic deformity effect (plastic as in plasticity/deformability meaning, not plastic as a type of material) to grab the top of the top nano tube, & the bottom thin end of the interior nano tube, then apply the appropriate tensile force (about 321.1 kilograms) to draw the interior tube out through the base of the exterior tube thus causing the interior tube to “deform” (& become even stronger due to that “plastic deformity” effect) & not lock in place, but instead become unable to fall further through the exterior tube but to be able to turn around in the horizontal (as if a “radiator clamp” was also a “bearing race”) d) draw THAT two-piece joined nano-tube “beginning-of-string” through a 3rd section & repeat, then that 3 piece length through a 4th nano tube, each “plastic deformity” both sealing the sections as an ever-lengthening “string” (more like a “ball chain” of “hourglasses”) where each new section can still rotate horizontally (relative to “thin end” of nano tubes as “down” direction) but that doesn’t weaken from the current “shear effect” problem, & in fact actually becomes LITERALLY much STRONGER, & also, once thus “drawn”, dual-directional & weavable, ie, NO resins required, & thus MASSIVELY lighter than even raw carbon fiber WITHOUT resin added. In fact more like “omni-directional”, ie, it would make damned interesting guitar strings for a start… or crossbow strings.

Ode